Innovation and the State/References

From YalePressWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Abouganem, M., and Feldman, M. 2002. Development of the High-Tech Industry in Israel, 1995–1999: Labour Force and Wages. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (in Hebrew).
  • AFX. 2001. VIA Sees P4 Chipset Dispute Impact Fully Reflected in Q4. AFX News Limited— AFX Asia. December 18.
  • Akamatsu, K. 1962. A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Developing Economies, 2, 3–25.
  • Amit, I. 1988. The Defense Industry as a Political and Strategic Factor. The State of Israel— The Ministry of Defense—Armament Development Authority—Center for Military Research, 88/02.
  • Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ———. 2001. The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Amsden, A., and Chu, W.-W. 2003. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Anchordoguy, M. 1989. Computers Inc.: Japan’s Challenge to IBM. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Ansell, C. K. 2000. The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe. Governance, 13, 279–291.
  • Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ariav, G., and Goodman, S. E. 1994. Israel: Of Swords and Software Plowshares. Communications of the ACM, 37, 17–21.
  • Arndt, S. W., and Kierzkowski, H. 2001a. Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Arora, A., and Gambardella, A. 2005. From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Some Emerging Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Arora, A., Gambardella, A., and Torrisi, S. 2001. In the Footsteps of Silicon Valley? Indian and Irish Software in the International Division of Labour. SIEPR Discussion Paper.
  • Arrow, J. K. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609–625). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Autler, G. H. 2000. Global Networks in High Technology: The Silicon Valley-Israel Connection. Master’s thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Avnimelech, G. and M. Teubal. 2003a. Evolutionary Venture Capital Policies: Insights from a Product Life Cycle Analysis of Israel’s Venture Capital Industry. Science, Technology, and the Economy Program (STE) Working Paper Series. Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology. Haifa.
  • ———. 2003b. Israel’s Venture Capital Industry: Emergence, Operation and Impact. In D. Cetindamar (Ed.), The Growth of Venture Capital: A Cross Cultural Comparison (pp. 207–240). Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
  • ———. 2004. Venture Capital Start-Up Co-Evolution and the Emergence and Development of Israel’s New High Technology Cluster. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13, no. 1, 33–60.
  • ———. 2006a. From Direct Support of Business Sector R&D Innovation to Targeting Venture Capital/Private Equity: A Catching-Up Innovation and Technology Policy Life Cycle Perspective. Forthcoming in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, special issue on the governance of technological knowledge.
  • ———. 2006b. Creating Venture Capital (VC) Industries that Co-Evolve with High Tech Clusters: Insights from an Extended Industry Life Cycle Perspective of the Israeli Experience. Forthcoming in Research Policy.
  • Bar, A. 1990. Industry and Industrial Policy in Israel—Landmarks. In Brodet, Justman, and Teubal 1990 (pp. 22–26).
  • Bathlet, H., Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. 2002. Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipeline, and the Process of Knowledge Creation. DRUID Working Paper 02-12.
  • Beaton, A., Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E., Smith, T., and Kelly, D. 1996. Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
  • Ben-Bassat, A. 2002. The Israeli Economy, 1985–1998: From Government Intervention to Market Economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Ben-Porath, Y. 1986. The Israeli Economy: Maturing Through Crises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bentur, A. 2002. Investment in Civilian R&D in Israel: Data as a Basis for Discussion in the Purpose of Developing a National Policy. STE Working Papers Series. Technion— Samuel Neaman Institute.
  • Berger, S. 2006. How We Compete: What Companies Around the World Are Doing to Make It in Today’s Global Economy. New York: Doubleday.
  • BIRD. 2000. BIRD Foundation Procedures Handbook. Tel Aviv: BIRD Foundation.
  • ———. 2004. BIRD Foundation Web site. www.birdf.com.
  • ———. Various years. Annual Reports. Tel Aviv: BIRD Foundation.
  • Bizan, O. 2001. Essays on the Economics of Research Alliances (Israel). Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University.
  • BOI. 2004. Table B-N-15, Total Factor Productivity by Sector 1961–2000. Israel’s Economy: Annual Tables. Jerusalem: Bank of Israel.
  • Bowsher, C. A. 1991. General Management Reviews: Building Government’s Capacity to Manage. In A. Friedberg, B. Geist, I. Sharkansky, and N. Mizrahi (Eds.), Accountability and State Audit (pp. 360–368). Jerusalem: State Comptroller’s Office.
  • Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., and Heidenreich, M. 1998. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London: UCL Press.
  • Breathnach, P. 1998. Exploring the “Celtic Tiger” Phenomenon: Causes and Consequences of Ireland’s Economic Miracle. European Urban and Regional Studies, 5, 305–316.
  • Bregman, A., Fuss, M., and Regev, H. 1998. The Effects of Capital Subsidization on Israeli Industry. NBER Working Paper Series.
  • Breschi, S., and Malerba, F. 1997. Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries. In Edquist 1997 (pp. 130–156).
  • Breznitz, D. 2005a. Collaborative Public Space in a National Innovation System: A Case Study of the Israeli Military’s Impact on the Software Industry. Industry and Innovation, 12, 31–64.
  • ———. 2005b. Development, Flexibility, and R&D Performance in the Taiwanese IT industry: Capability Creation and the Effects of State-Industry Co-Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 153–187.
  • ———. 2005c. Innovation and the Limits of State Power: IC Design and Software in Taiwan. In S. Berger and R. Lester (Eds.), Global Taiwan (pp. 194–227). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
  • ———. 2005d. An Iron Cage or the Final Stage? Intensive Product R&D and the Evolution of the Israeli Software Industry. Research Policy, revised and resubmitted.
  • ———. 2005e. Software Tooling: The Development of the Israeli Software Industry. In A. Arora and A. Gambardella (Eds.), From Underdogs to Tigers: The Software Industry in Emerging Countries (pp. 72–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • ———. 2006. Innovation-Based Industrial Policy in Emerging Economies? The Case of Israel’s IT Industry. Business and Politics, 8, no. 3, 1–38.
  • Brodet, D., Justman, M., and Teubal, M. 1990. Industrial-Technological Policy for Israel. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies (in Hebrew).
  • Bruno, M. 1989. Israel’s Crisis and Economic Reform: A Historical Perspective. NBER Working Paper Series.
  • Burt, S. R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Calder, K. E. 1993. Strategic Capitalism: Private Business and Public Purpose in Japanese Industrial Finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Carlsson, B. 1995. Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation. London: Kluwer.
  • Carlsson, B., and Eliason, G. 1994. The Nature and Importance of Economic Competence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 687–711.
  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., and Rickne, A. 2002. Innovation System: Analytical and Methodological Issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.
  • CBS. 1999a. National Expenditure of Civilian Research and Development, 1989–1998. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • ———. 1999b. National Expenditure on Education, 1962–1997. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • ———. 2000a. Education in Israel and International Comparison, 1995. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • ———. 2000b. National Expenditure of Civilian Research and Development, 1989–1999. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • ———. 2001. Development of Information Communication Technology in the Last Decade. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics—Israel.
  • ———. 2004a. The Development of the ICT Sector in Israel, 2003. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • ———. 2004b. Israel’s Statistical Abstract. Jerusalem: State of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
  • Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., and Tsai, C.-T. 1999. A Stage Approach for Industrial Development and Implementation: The Case of Taiwan’s Computer Industry. Technovation, 19, 233–241.
  • Chang, P.-L., and Tsai, C.-T. 2002. Finding the Niche Position: Competition Strategy of Taiwan’s IC Design Industry. Technovation, 22, 101–111.
  • Cheng, T.-J. 1990. Political Regimes and Developmental Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan. In G. Gereffi and D. Wyman (Eds.), Manufacturing Miracles (pp. 139–178). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • ———. 1993. Guarding the Commanding Heights: The State as Banker in Taiwan. In S. Haggard, C. H. Lee, and S. Maxfield (Eds.), The Politics of Financing in Developing Countries (pp. 55–92). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Chibber, V. 2002. Bureaucratic Rationalist and the Developmental State. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 951–989.
  • ———. 2003. Locked in Place: State-building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Chinworth, M. W. 1992. Inside Japan’s Defense. Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s.
  • Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
  • ———. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
  • Cooke, P., and Morgan, K. 1998. The Associational Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cumings, B. 1984. The Origins and Development of Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences. International Organization, 38, 1–40.
  • Daly, G. 2002. “Iona Offspring Surprised by CapeClear Row.” Sunday Business Post. May 5.
  • Dedrick, J., and Kraemer, L. K. 1998. Asia’s Computer Challenge: Threat or Opportunity for the United States and the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • de Fontenay, C., and Carmel, E. 2001. Israel’s Silicon Wadi: The Forces Behind Cluster Formation. SIEPR Discussion Paper.
  • Deri, D. 1993. Political Appointments in Israel: Between Statism and Political Party-ism. Tel Aviv: United Kibutz Press (in Hebrew).
  • DOIT. 2003. TDP Annual Budget, 1993–2003. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Department of Industrial Technology.
  • Dosi, G. 1982. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Direction of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11, 147–163.
  • Dror, Y. 2002. Intel Develops in Israel a Cellular Laptop. Ha’aretz (in Hebrew). February 6.
  • Dunning, J. H. 1994. Multinational Enterprises and the Globalization of Innovatory Capacity. Research Policy, 23, 67–88.
  • Durkan, J., FitzGerald, D., and Harmon, C. 1999. Education and Growth in the Irish Economy. In F. Barry (Ed.), Understanding Ireland’s Economic Growth (pp. 119–136). London: Macmillan.
  • Economics, E.G.P.A. 2001. The Operational Achievements of the Israeli Technology Incubators Program. Conducted for the Technology Incubators Administration, the Office of the Chief Scientist, in the Ministry of Trade and Industry, Israel.
  • Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London: Pinter.
  • Efrati, N. 1999. In the Beginning: 40 Years of Computing in Israel. Tel Aviv: Meta Group Israel (in Hebrew).
  • EI. 2000. 2000 Report: Seed and Venture Capital Measure of the Operational Program, 1994– 1999. Dublin: Enterprise-Ireland.
  • EI. Various years. Annual Reports. Dublin: Enterprise Ireland.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
  • Ernst, D. 2005a. Complexity and Internationalisation of Innovation: Why Is Chip Design Moving to Asia? International Journal of Innovation Management, 9, no. 1, 47–73.
  • ———. 2005b. Pathways to Innovation in Asia’s Leading Electronics-Exporting Countries: A Framework for Exploring Drivers and Policy Implications. International Journal of Technology Management, special issue, “Competitive Strategies of Asian High-Tech Firms,” 29, nos. 1–2, 6–20.
  • Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Evans, P., and Rauch, E. J. 1999. Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of “Weberian” State Structure on Economic Growth. American Sociological Review, 64, 748–765.
  • Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feenstra, R. C. 1998. Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 31–50.
  • Felsenstein, D. 1997. The Making of a High Technology Node: Foreign-owned Companies in Israeli High Technology. Regional Studies, 31, 367–380.
  • Fields, K. 1995. Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  • Freeman, C., and Lundvall, B.-Å. 1988. Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. London: Pinter.
  • FT. 2003a. Mediatek to Challenge World’s No. 4 Spot in IC Design. Financial Times Global News Wire. November 25.
  • ———. 2003b. Taiwanese Chip Designers Facing Lukewarm Season Earlier. Financial Times Global News Wire. December 9.
  • ———. 2003c. VIA, Intel Reach Patent Suit Settlement, to Jointly Face Competitors. Financial Times Global News Wire. April 9.
  • Fuller, D. B. 2002. Globalization for Nation Building: Industrial Policy for High- Technology Products in Taiwan. MIT IPC Working Paper.
  • Fuller, D. B., Akinwande, A., and Sodini, C. G. 2003. Leading, Following or Cooked Goose: Successes and Failures in Taiwan’s Electronics Industry. Industry and Innovation, 10, 179–196.
  • Galvin, P., and Morkel, A. 2001. The Effects of Product Modularity on Industry Structure: The Case of the World Bicycle Industry. Industry and Innovation, 8, 31–47.
  • Gassmann, O., and von Zedtwitz, M. 1999. New Concepts and Trends in International R&D Organization. Research Policy, 28, 231–250.
  • Gereffi, G. 1994. The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How the U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Network. In Gereffi and Korzeniewicz 1994 (pp. 95–122).
  • ———. 1996. Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labor in East Asia. Journal of Asian Business, 12, 75–112.
  • ———. 1999. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37–70.
  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, J. T. 2005. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, no. 1, 78–104.
  • Gereffi, G., and Korzeniewicz, M. 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Gerybadze, A., and Reger, G. 1999. Globalization of R&D: Recent Changes in Management of Innovation in Transnational Corporations. Research Policy, 28, 251–274.
  • Giuliani, E. 2002. Cluster Absorptive Capability: An Evolutionary Approach for Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries. DRUID Summer Conference. Industrial Dynamics for the New and Old Economy: Who Is Embracing Whom? Copenhagen.
  • Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Gold, T. B. 1986. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. New York: Armonk.
  • Gourevitch, P. 2000. Globalization of Production: Insights from the Hard Drive Disk Industry. World Development, 28, 301–317.
  • Granovetter, S. M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.
  • Grimes, S., and Collins, P. 2003. Building a Knowledge Economy in Ireland Through European Research Networks. European Planning Studies, 11, 395–413.
  • Grinberg, L. L. 1991. Split Corporatism in Israel. New York: SUNY Press.
  • Guillen, M. F. 2001. The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Guiomard, C. 1995. The Irish Disease and How to Cure It: Common-Sense Economics for a Competitive World. Dublin: Oak Tree.
  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Papers.
  • Hall, P., and Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Halperin, A. 1987. The Building of the Military Power and Economic Growth. Economic Quarterly, 16, 990–1010 (in Hebrew).
  • Halperin, A., and Berman, E. 1990. Skilled Labor, Security, and Growth. In D. Brodet, M. Justman and M. Teubal (Eds.), Industrial-Technological Policy for Israel. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies (in Hebrew).
  • Halperin, A., and Tsiddon, D. 1992. The Conversion of the Israeli Defense Industry: The Labor Market. The Israeli International Institute for Applied Economic Policy Review. Tel Aviv.
  • Hardiman, N. 2000. Socia l Partnership, Wage Bargaining, and Growth. In B. Nolan, P. J. O’Connell, and C. T. Whelan (Eds.), From Bust to Boom (pp. 286–309). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  • ———. 2002. From Conflict to Co-ordination: Economic Governance and Political Innovation in Ireland. West European Politics, 25, 1–24.
  • Haughton, J. 2000. The Historical Background. In J. W. O’Hagan (Ed.), The Economy of Ireland: Policy and Performance of a European Region (pp. 2–46). Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
  • HEA. 2006. The PRTLI: Program Overview. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.
  • Heclo, H. 1977. A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Washington: Brookings Institution.
  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., and Yeung, W.-C. H. 2002. Global Production Networks and the Analysis of Economic Development. Review of International Political Economy, 9, 436–464.
  • Herrigel, G., and Wittke, V. 2004. Varieties of Vertical Integration: The Global Trend Toward Heterogeneous Supply Relations and the Reproduction of Difference in the U.S. and German Manufacturing. In G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moan (Eds.), Changing Capitalism (pp. 312–351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hille, K. 2003. Intel Deal Puts SiS Under Cloud. Financial Times. April 9.
  • Hong, S. G. 1997. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in East Asia: The Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea. Cambridge: Edward Elgar.
  • Hsu, C.-W., and Chiang, H.-C. 2001. The Government Strategy for the Upgrading of Industrial Technology in Taiwan. Technovation, 21, 123–132.
  • Hung, F. 2002. Taiwan’s Chipset Sales Plunge. Financial Times Information. July 10.
  • Hung, S.-C. 2000. Institutions and System of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Taiwan’s Personal Computer Competitiveness. Technology in Society, 22, 175–187.
  • Hwang, Y. D. 1991. A Rise of a New World Economic Power: Postwar Taiwan. New York: Greenwood.
  • IAEI. 2006. Israel Electronics Industries Profile. Tel Aviv: Israel Association of Electronic and Software Industries.
  • IASH. 2003. Israel Software Industry Statistical Information: IASH. Tel Aviv: Israel Association of Software Houses.
  • IC Insights. 2004. The McLean Report. Scottsdale, Ariz.: IC Insights.
  • IDA. 2000. Ireland: Vital Statistics. Dublin: IDA—Ireland.
  • ———. 2006. Industrial Statistics. Dublin: IDA—Ireland.
  • III. Various years. Zixun GongYe Nianjian (The Yearbook of Information Industry). Taipei: Institute for Information Industry, Market Intelligence Center.
  • ISA. 2003. Irish Software Industry Outlook, 2003. Dublin: Irish Software Association.
  • ———. 2004. Irish Software Industry Outlook, 2004. Dublin: Irish Software Association.
  • IT. 2003a. Intel Opens 12m Euro Innovation Center. Irish Times. June 28.
  • ———. 2003b. Policies of Tech Sector Urgent—IBEC. Irish Times. January 23.
  • ITRI. 2003. Bandaoti Gongye Nianjian (The Yearbook of Semiconductor Industry). Hsinchu: ITRI—ITIS.
  • ———. 2005. Bandaoti Gongye Nianjian (The Yearbook of Semiconductor Industry). Hsinchu: ITRI—ITIS.
  • ———. Various years. Industrial Statistics. Hsinchu: Industrial Technology Research Institute, Industrial Economic and Knowledge Center.
  • IVA. 1997–2003. Year Books: A Survey of the Israeli Venture Capital and Private Equity Industry. Tel Aviv: Israeli Venture Capital Association.
  • JIM. 1987. Export-led Growth Strategy for Israel. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute of Management and the Telesis Group.
  • Johnson, C. A. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925– 1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ———. 1995. Japan, Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State. New York: Norton.
  • Justman, M., and Teubal, M. 1995. Technological Infrastructure Policy (TIP): Creating Capabilities and Building Markets. Research Policy, 24, 259–281.
  • Justman, M., Zuscovitch, E., and Teubal, M. 1993. Technological Infrastructure Policy for Renewed Growth. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies (in Hebrew).
  • Katchalski, E. 1968. The Report of the Committee to Inquire into the Organization of Governmental Research and Its Management. Jerusalem: Office of the Prime Minister (in Hebrew).
  • Kennedy, L. 1989. The Modern Industrialisation of Ireland, 1940–1988. Dublin: Economic and Social History Society of Ireland.
  • Kenney, M., and Florida, R. L. 2004. Locating Global Advantage: Industry Dynamics in the International Economy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Kim, H.-K., Muramatsu, M., Pempel, T. J., and Yamamura, K. 1995. The Japanese Civil Service and Economic Development: Catalysts of Change. New York: Oxford University Press, Clarendon.
  • Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Klintworth, G. 1995. New Taiwan, New China: Taiwan’s Changing Role in the Asia-Pacific Region. New York: St. Martin’s.
  • Kohli, A. 1994. Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea’s “Developmental State.” World Development, 22, 1269–1293.
  • Lester, R. K., and Piore, M. J. 2004. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Levav, A. 1998. The Birth of Israel’s High-Tech. Tel Aviv: Zemora-Bitan.
  • Levi-Faur, D. 1998. The Developmental State: Israel, South Korea, and Taiwan Compared. Studies in Comparative International Development, 33, 65–93.
  • ———. 2001. The Visible Hand: State Directed Industrialization in Israel. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi (in Hebrew).
  • Lillington, K. 2003a. IBM Sets Eye on Dublin for Research Agenda. Irish Times. September 12.
  • ———. 2003b. Indigenous Software Industry “Struggling.” Irish Times. December 11.
  • Lin, Y. 1987. A Study of an Emerging Industry in a LDC: A Case Study of Taiwan’s IC Industry. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan University (in Chinese).
  • Locke, R. M. 1995. Remaking the Italian Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
  • Lundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., and Dalum, B. 2002. National Systems of Production, Innovation, and Competence Building. Research Policy, 31, 213–231.
  • MacSharry, R., and White, P. 2001. The Making of the Celtic Tiger: The Inside Story of Ireland’s Boom Economy. Dublin: Mercier.
  • Mardor, M. M. 1981. RAFAEL. Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense of Israel Press (in Hebrew).
  • Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E., Gregory, K., Smith, T., Chrostowski, S., Garden, R., and O’Connor, K. 2000. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College, International Study Center.
  • Mathews, J. A. 2002. The Origins and Dynamics of Taiwan’s R&D Consortia. Research Policy, 31, 633–651.
  • Mathews, J. A., and Cho, D.-S. 2000. Tiger Technologies: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McKendrick, D., Doner, R. F., and Haggard, S. 2000. From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • McManus, J. 2002. All Is Not Rosy in the Venture Capital Garden. Irish Times. September 30.
  • Meany, C. S. 1994. State Policy and the Development of Taiwan’s Semiconductors Industry. In J. D. Aberbach, D. Dollar, and K. L. Sokoloff (Eds.), The Role of the State in Taiwan’s Development (pp. 170–192). Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
  • MoEA. Various years. Economic Statistics Annual, Taiwan Area, Republic of China. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • M.O.P. 2000. Report on Irish Venture Capital Industry. Dublin: Matheson Ormsby Prentice and the Irish Venture Capital Association.
  • Morgan, K. 1997. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation, and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503.
  • MOTI. 1998. Israel’s Economic Overview. Jerusalem: Ministry of Industry and Trade.
  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Beaton, A., Gonzalez, E., Kelly, D., and Smith, T. 1997. Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Gregory, K., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., Chrostowski, S., and Smith, T. 2000. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College: International Study Center.
  • Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • NID. 2006. Software Industry Statistics for 1991–2004. Dublin: National Informatics Directorate.
  • Noble, G. W. 1998. Collective Action in East Asia: How Ruling Parties Shape Industrial Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • NSB. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2000. Washington, D.C.: National Science Board.
  • O’Brien, J. A. 1953. The Vanishing Irish: The Enigma of the Modern World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • OCS. 1974. The Office of the Chief Scientist. Jerusalem: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist.
  • ———. 1975. Industrial Research and Development Background and Policy. Jerusalem: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist.
  • ———. 1977. Industrial Research and Development in Israel: Policy and Issues. Jerusalem: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist.
  • ———. 2000. Database of Annual Activities. Jerusalem: Ministry of Trade and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist (in Hebrew).
  • ———. 2002. Summary of 2001. Jerusalem: Ministry of Trade and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist (in Hebrew).
  • ———. 2003. Summary of Operations, 2002. Jerusalem: Ministry of Trade and Industry, Office of the Chief Scientist (in Hebrew).
  • OECD. 1965. Investment in Education. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • ———. 1969. Review of National Policies for Education: Ireland. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • O’Gorman, C., O’Malley, E., and Mooney, J. 1997. Clusters in Ireland: The Irish Indigenous Software Industry. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.
  • O’Gr’ada, C. 1997. A Rocky Road: The Irish Economy Since the 1920s. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • O’Halloran, B. 2003. Business Happy with Extension of BES and SCS. Irish Times. December 4.
  • O’Hearn, D. 1998. Inside the Celtic Tiger: The Irish Economy and the Asian Model. London: Pluto.
  • O’Keeffe, B. 2003. Flinter Leaves Legacy of Competitiveness. Irish Times. July 4.
  • Okimoto, D. I. 1987. Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Technology for High Technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • O’Riain, S. 1997. The Birth of a Celtic Tiger? Communications of the ACM, 40, 11–16.
  • ———. 1999. Remaking the Developmental State: The Irish Software Industry in the Global Economy. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.
  • ———. 2000. The Flexible Development State: Globalization, Information Technology, and the “Celtic Tiger.” Politics and Society, 28, 157–193.
  • ———. 2004. The Politics of High Tech Growth: Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Sullivan, M. 2000a. Industrial Development: A New Beginning? In J. W. O’Hagan (Ed.), The Economy of Ireland: Policy and Performance of a European Region (pp. 260– 282). Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
  • ———. 2000b. The Sustainability of Industrial Development in Ireland. Regional Studies, 34, 277–290.
  • Pack, H. 1993. Exports and Externalities: The Source of Taiwan’s Growth in Taiwan. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Park, P. H. 2000. A Reflection on the East Asian Developmental Model: Comparison of the South Korea and Taiwanese Experiences. In E. Richter (Ed.), The East Asian Development Model: Economic Growth Institutional Failure and the Aftermath of the Crisis (pp. 141–168). London: Macmillan.
  • Pearce, R. D. 1999. Decentralised R&D and Strategic Competitiveness: Globalised Approaches to Generation and Use of Technology in Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). Research Policy, 28, 157–178.
  • Pfiffner, J. P. 1992. Political Appointees and Career Executives: The Democracy- Bureaucracy Nexus. In P. W. Ingraham and D. F. Kettl (Eds.), Agenda for Excellence: Public Service in America (pp. 48–65). Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
  • Piore, M., Lester, R., Kofman, F., and Malek, K. 1994. The Organization of Product Development. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 405–434.
  • Piore, M. J., and Sabel, C. F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic.
  • PWC. 2000. Money for Growth: The European Technology Investment Report, 2000. PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
  • ———. 2005. 2004 Annual European Private Equity Survey. PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
  • ———. 2006. Money for Growth: The European Private Equity Report, 2005. Price WaterhouseCoopers.
  • Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • ———. 1994. Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge.
  • Reddy, P. 2000. Globalization of Corporate R&D: Implications for Innovation Systems in Host Countries. London: Routledge.
  • Rehav, U. 1998. Armament Development Institutes and Their Economics. 3rd ed. Haifa: State of Israel, Defense Ministry, Armaments Development Authority, Center for Military Studies (in Hebrew).
  • Roberts, E. B. 1999. Global Benchmarking of the Strategic Management of Technology. MIT IPC Working Paper 99-007.
  • Rose, R. 1981. The Political Status of Higher Civil Servants in Britain. Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathcyle.
  • ———. 1986. A House Divided: Political Administration in Britain Today. Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathcyle.
  • Rostow, W. W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ruane, F., and Görg, H. 2001. Globalization and Fragmentation: Evidence for the Electronics Industry in Ireland. In Arndt and Kierzkowski 2001 (pp. 144–164).
  • Samuels, R. J. 1988. The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • ———. 1994. Rich Nation Strong Army: National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Sands, A. 2005. The Irish Software Industry. In A. Arora and A. Gambardella (Eds.), From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Some Emerging Economies (pp. 41–71). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Saxenian, A., and Hsu, J.-Y. 2001. The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 893–920.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1961 [1934]. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Shalev, M. 1992. Labour and the Political Economy in Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sharkansky, I. 1989. Israeli Civil Service Positions Open to Political Appointments. International Journal of Public Administration, 12, 731–748.
  • Sharon, E., and Naamen, Y. 1961. Electronic Computers in Taxes and Administrative Services: A Report of a European Survey. Jerusalem: State of Israel, Chamber of the State’s Revenues.
  • Shefer, D., and Frenkel, A. 2002. An Evaluation of the Israeli Technological Incubator Program and Its Projects. The Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, IFISE Report.
  • Smith, A. 1937. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.
  • Smyth, J. 2004a. Fiscal Incentive Schemes Delayed by EU Review. Irish Times. July 8.
  • ———. 2004b. IBM Invests a22 million in Dublin Software Laboratory. Irish Times. May 12.
  • SO. 1958a. Economic Development. Dublin: Stationary Office.
  • ———. 1958b. Programme for Economic Expansion. Dublin: Stationery Office.
  • Sterne, J. 2004. Adventures in Code: The Story of the Irish Software Industry. Dublin: Liffey.
  • Stigler, G. J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3–21.
  • Sturgeon, T. J. 2000. Turnkey Production Networks: The Organizational Delinking of Production from Innovation. In U. Jürgens (Ed.), New Product Development and Production Networks (pp. 67–84). New York: Springer.
  • ———. 2001. How Do We Define Value Chains and Production Networks? Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 32.
  • ———. 2002. Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 451–496.
  • ———. 2003. What Really Goes on in Silicon Valley? Spatial Clustering and Dispersal in Modular Production Networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 199–225.
  • Sturgeon, T. J., and Lester, R. 2004. The New Global Supply-Base: New Challenges for Local Suppliers in East Asia. In S. Yusuf, A. Altaf, and K. Nabeshima (Eds.), Global Production Networking and Technological Change in East Asia (pp. 35–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sweeny, P. 1999. The Celtic Tiger: Ireland’s Continuing Economic Miracle. Dublin: Oak Tree.
  • TAF. 2002. Calendar Year Patent Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Information Products Division, Technology Assessment and Forecast Branch.
  • Taylor, C. 2003. Tech Lobby Calls for Introduction of R&D Tax Credit in Next Budget. Irish Times. November 1.
  • Teubal, M. 1983. Neutrality in Science Policy: The Case of Sophisticated Industrial Technology in Israel. Minerva, 21, 172–197.
  • ———. 1993. The Innovation System of Israel: Description, Performance, and Outstanding Issues. In Nelson 1993 (pp. 476–502).
  • ———. 1996. R&D and Technology Policy in NICs as Learning Processes. World Development, 24, 449–460.
  • ———. 1997. A Catalytic and Evolutionary Approach to Horizontal Technology Policies (HTPs). Research Policy, 25, 1161–1188.
  • ———. 2002. What Is the Systems Perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) and How Can We Apply It to Developing and Newly Industrialized Economies? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 233–257.
  • Teubal, M., Avnimelech, G., and Gayego, A. 2002. Company Growth, Acquisitions and Access to Complementary Assets in Israel’s Data Security Sector. European Planning Studies, 10, 933–953.

Teubal, M., Foray, D., Justman, M., and Zuscovitch, E. 1996. Technological Infrastructure Policy: An International Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

  • Teubal, M., Naftali, A., and Trajtenberg, M. 1976. Performance in Innovation in the Israeli Electronics Industry: A Case Study of Biomedical Electronics Instrumentation. Research Policy, 5, 354–379.
  • Teubal, M., and Spiller, P. T. 1977. Analysis of R&D Failure. Research Policy, 6, 254–275.
  • Teubal, M., Yinnon, T., and Zuscovitch, E. 1991. Networks and Market Creation. Research Policy, 20, 381–392.
  • Trajtenberg, M. 2001. Innovation in Israel, 1968–1997: A Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data. Research Policy, 30, 363–389.
  • ———. 2005. R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment. NBER Working Paper Series.
  • Tsuk, N. 2004. Community, State, and Utopia: National Policy and Local Prosperity in the English Garden City and the Israeli Kibbutz. Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge.
  • Van Evera, S. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Vekstein, D. 1999. Defense Conversion, Technology Policy, and R&D Networks in the Innovation System of Israel. Technovation, 19, 615–629.
  • Vernon, R. 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.
  • Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of the Government in the East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Walsh, B. 1999. The Persistence of High Unemployment in a Small Open Labor Market: The Irish Case. In F. Barry (Ed.), Understanding Ireland’s Economic Growth (pp. 193– 226). London: Macmillan.
  • Wang, W.-C. V. 1995. Developing the Information Industry in Taiwan: Entrepreneurial State, Guerrilla Capitalists, and Accommodative Technologists. Pacific Affairs, 68, 551– 576.
  • WB. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Weber, M. 1952. The Essential of Bureaucratic Organization. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Reader in Bureaucracy (pp. 19–27). New York: Free Press.
  • ———. 1958. Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • ———. 1999. Essays in Economic Sociology. Ed. Richard Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Weiss, L. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • White, T. 2001. Investing in People: Higher Education in Ireland from 1960 to 2000. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  • Woo-Cumings, M. 1991. Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • ———. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Wu, Y. 2001. In Search of an Explanation of SME-Led Growth: State Survival, Bureaucratic Politics, and Private Enterprise in the Making of the Taiwanese Economy, 1950– 1985. Ph.D. diss., Leiden University.
  • ———. 2005. A Political Explanation of Economic Growth: State Survival, Bureaucratic Politics, and Private Enterprise in the Making of Taiwan Economy, 1950–1985. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Yaakov, I. 1974. Industrial Research and Development and University Research in Israel. A report prepared by Ithak Yaakov, Chief Scientist, Ministry of Trade and Industry, and submitted to the President of the State of Israel.
  • Yahalomi, L. 1991. Promoting International Cooperation as a Strategy for Economic Development: A Case Analysis of Israeli and U.S. High-Technology Partnerships (United States). Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
  • Yeats, A. J. 2001. Just How Big Is Global Production Sharing? In Arndt and Kierzkowski 2001 (pp. 108–143).
  • Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
  • Zysman, J. 1983. Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.



This site made possible through the generous support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Retrieved from "http://www.yalepresswiki.org/wiki/Innovation_and_the_State/References"
Personal tools